All selected work

02 / AI systems · Independent project

Different agents.
Shared context.

A shared knowledge and delegation system for Codex, Claude Code and Hermes. Built to carry useful context between tools, while keeping human judgment in the loop.

My role
System design, integration and workflow design
Focus
Retrieval, delegation and operational safeguards
Access
Public overview · Private implementation

The problem

Useful context should not stop at the end of a conversation.

Working with several AI tools creates a practical coordination problem: notes, decisions and corrections can stay attached to individual sessions instead of informing the next piece of work.

I connected existing agent tools to a shared, Git-versioned body of Obsidian notes. The goal was continuity: retrieve relevant material, delegate a bounded task and preserve what is worth reusing.

Conceptual workflow / Not deployment topology
  1. 01 / Shared context

    Retrieve

    Versioned notes, accessed through keyword, semantic and graph search.

  2. 02 / Focused work

    Delegate

    Existing agent tools, with specialist responsibilities and bounded tasks.

  3. 03 / Human judgment

    Review & retain

    Approval, feedback and deliberate updates to reusable skills and workflows.

Monitoring, backup and recovery support the workflow. Private notes, prompts, configurations and implementation details are not part of this overview.

Design decisions

  1. Make the knowledge reusable, not tool-specific

    Git-versioned Obsidian notes provide shared context for Codex, Claude Code and Hermes. Versioning makes changes reviewable rather than treating the knowledge base as an invisible, ever-changing memory.

  2. Use more than one route to retrieval

    Keyword search handles exact terms. Semantic retrieval finds related meaning. Graph links connect concepts across notes. Together they make the knowledge accessible in more than one way.

  3. Delegate tasks without delegating accountability

    Specialist agents support focused work. Human approval, monitoring, backup and recovery remain part of the operating approach; automation does not remove the need to inspect important outputs.

  4. Turn corrections into better working habits

    A feedback workflow captures useful corrections and updates reusable skills and workflows. This is process improvement, not model training.

Scope & boundaries

The work is in how the pieces fit together.

My contribution is system design and integration: shaping how existing tools share context, route work and incorporate feedback. The underlying models and frameworks remain the work of their respective creators.

Experimental graph-memory work stays separate from production memory while I explore retrieval quality and source provenance.

This page shares the design approach, not the implementation. Source code, prompts, configurations, knowledge contents and deployment details stay private.

What matters to me

Capability is only useful with a way to check it.

The most interesting part is not simply adding another tool. It is deciding what should be remembered, what should be retrieved, what can be delegated and what still needs a person’s judgment.

That is the kind of applied AI work I want to keep doing: connecting technical capabilities to a concrete way of working, with clear limits and a route to recovery.